Nuke Media Distortion with Facts—What to Believe about the Dangers of Japan’s Nuclear Reactors
March 14, 2011 4 Comments
Are you good at believing the things you believe? That’s my motto. So what are we supposed to believe about the danger of nuclear radiation following Japan’s recent 9.0 earthquake and damage to nuclear reactors at two locations?
First, why we need to know what is happening:
- We care about the safety of the Japanese people.
- We care about the safety about the world population.
- We care about radiation drift toward North America.
- We have energy needs that may be met with new reactors in the U.S., but only if they’re safe.
Second, why the mainstream media cannot be trusted for knowledge of what is happening:
- The media are prone to sensationalize the “news” in order to boost their ratings.
- The media have a liberal bias, which is already heavily invested in opposition to nuclear energy.
- The media have no idea what a reactor is, how one works, and what terms mean when used to described behavior at a nuclear plant (e.g., “meltdown).
- The media, even if they try for “balanced coverage” by “experts” with opposing views, are as likely to get crackpots having their own meltdown over what’s happening in Japan.
Third, the only way to nuke media distortion (whether deliberate or not) is with facts and critical reflection.
For facts, the internet is probably your best guide.
- The American Nuclear Society is providing coverage and analysis of events in Japan. (Read their “About” page.)
- World Nuclear News
- Brave New Climate
The most valuable report I’ve read so far comes from Dr. Josef Oehman, a research scientist in mechanical engineering and engineering systems at MIT. Read his analysis “Why I am not worried about Japan’s nuclear reactors”. The cost of being well-informed is the effort of becoming informed. Oehman’s article is lengthy, but accessible. You can settle for sound bytes or get the facts in clear and cogent detail.
Oehman captures the threat level with this advice:
If you were sitting on top of the plants’ chimney when they were venting, you should probably give up smoking to return to your former life expectancy.
I’ve started following Oehman on Twitter.
Of course, you want more than one doctor’s opinion. So switch off your TV and search out other reliable sources of real information. If you must monitor the TV coverage, be sure to note the names of specialists and experts who are interviewed, find out who they work for, and examine their credentials.
And listen carefully to the naive questions the journalists are asking. Watch for their own off-hand comments and simplistic reactions. Last night I watched Geraldo interview specialists about the news out of Japan. Geraldo marveled with near-panic that engineers had resorted to flooding their reactors with sea water in order to cool the over-heated reactors. Apparently he didn’t know that this is backup protocol when disaster strikes. (See the article by Oehman.)
Critics of nuclear energy will be sorely tempted to make good use of the disaster in Japan. But this could backfire on them if it turns out that the 9.0 earthquake demonstrates the safety and viability of nuclear power plants, even when disaster strikes.
Time will tell.